Legislature(1993 - 1994)

02/22/1994 03:00 PM House L&C

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
  HB 459 - DAMAGES & ATTY FEES FOR UNPAID WAGES                                
  REP. ELDON MULDER explained that HB 459 attempts to correct                  
  a provision in statute which pertains to wage and hour.                      
  Recently, an interpretation by the court posed a problem                     
  with liquidated damages.  Rep. Mulder went on to explain                     
  that when there is a dispute regarding underpaid or unpaid                   
  overtime compensation, liquidated damages double the amount                  
  in dispute.  This is over what the federal law provides.                     
                                                                               
  REP. MULDER stated that our statutes were interpreted to                     
  mean that disputes could be handled by either the Department                 
  of Labor or administratively between the individual making                   
  the claim and the employer, out of court for less than                       
  liquidated damages.                                                          
                                                                               
  REP. MULDER said in the Kinney Shoe case, the court                          
  interpreted the statute to read differently then what was                    
  being done.  The court ruled that no case could be settled                   
  for less than liquidated damages.  Rep. Mulder contends this                 
  was not what the legislature intended and HB 459 would                       
  correct and clarify this situation.                                          
                                                                               
  Number 100                                                                   
                                                                               
  CHAIRMAN HUDSON noted the Department of Labor supported HB
  459, but offered a suggestion to expand the definition of                    
  good faith to include affirmative action taken by the                        
  employer to comply with state law.  The department also                      
  wants section 4, regarding the retroactivity provision.                      
                                                                               
  REP. MULDER explained that the issue is basically how do you                 
  interpret good faith.  As it stands now, the court may award                 
  less than liquidated damages if it believes the employer                     
  legitimately was unaware of the underpaid or unpaid                          
  compensations.                                                               
                                                                               
  REP. MULDER stated the reason the definition of good faith                   
  has not been expanded at this time is because there are                      
  precedent setting cases that have determined what good faith                 
  means, and to expand the definition may cloud the issue.                     
                                                                               
  REP. MULDER responded to the Department of Labor's other                     
  concern by saying the provision in HB 459 regarding                          
  retroactivity was put in to make a level playing field from                  
  before the pre-Kinney shoe case to post-Kinney.  It was                      
  never the intent of this bill to be overly punitive.                         
                                                                               
  Number 185                                                                   
                                                                               
  PERRY GROVER, Labor Relations Attorney, testified in support                 
  of HB 459.  He noted the Alaska Wage and Hour Act is                         
  patterned after the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act.                        
  Alaska mandates liquidated damages, but federal law and most                 
  other states allow a very narrow exception that an employer                  
  can show it acted in good faith and reasonably believed the                  
  position was not subject to overtime.  The court could then                  
  use its discretion not to award liquidated damages.                          
                                                                               
  MR. GROVER believes that HB 459 will leave liquidated                        
  damages as a penalty, but will allow employers the exception                 
  of good faith.                                                               
                                                                               
  MR. GROVER commented that HB 459 would also reinstate the                    
  authority with the commissioner of Labor, to waive                           
  liquidated damages if he sees fit.  This was the case prior                  
  to the Kinney Shoe case but not after.                                       
                                                                               
  MR. GROVER believes that subsection (f) will undue the part                  
  of the Kinney Shoe case where the Supreme Court said that                    
  private settlements are void.                                                
                                                                               
  MR. GROVER stated the intention of the drafters of this bill                 
  regarding good faith was to use the same standards the                       
  federal government and other states have been using.  He                     
  feels if Alaska uses any other language than the federal                     
  government, it would just encourage lawsuits.                                
                                                                               
  MR. GROVER said the reason the effective date was broken                     
  into two operative provisions is because the commissioner of                 
  Labor wanted section 3(e) to become effective on the                         
  effective date of the Act.  The other provisions provide for                 
  any cases that are pending to use these new standards                        
  clarified by HB 459.                                                         
                                                                               
  Number 372                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. JOE GREEN asked what the section on reasonable                          
  attorneys fees meant.                                                        
                                                                               
  MR. GROVER responded that reasonable attorney fees would be                  
  determined under Alaska Court Rule 82.                                       
                                                                               
  Number 400                                                                   
                                                                               
  BRUCE WEYRAUCH, Attorney, Faulkner, Banfield, Doogan &                       
  Holmes, mentioned his concerns regarding HB 459.  Mr.                        
  Weyrauch stated that Alaska is unique in its huge seasonal                   
  workforce.  Those companies and businesses that come in to                   
  the state to do work on a seasonal basis generally don't pay                 
  as much attention to our laws as those companies who stay                    
  here.                                                                        
                                                                               
  Number 440                                                                   
                                                                               
  MR. WEYRAUCH stated the wage and hour laws were intended to                  
  be strictly enforced, and as the Supreme Court said in the                   
  Kinney Shoe case, very punitive in nature, if they are not                   
  followed.                                                                    
                                                                               
  Number 450                                                                   
                                                                               
  MR. WEYRAUCH suggested an amendment to HB 459 that would                     
  avoid litigation and allow the Department of Labor to get                    
  involved in the front end of the issue.                                      
                                                                               
  MR. WEYRAUCH suggested a second amendment to provide                         
  supervision by the commissioner of Labor of any payment of                   
  the unpaid minimum wages or the unpaid overtime in dispute.                  
                                                                               
  Number 477                                                                   
                                                                               
  RUPE ANDREWS, Volunteer, AARP, expressed his concern that HB
  459 did not provide any supervision of wage and hour                         
  settlements to protect senior citizens.                                      
                                                                               
  Number 490                                                                   
                                                                               
  CHAIRMAN HUDSON asked if there were any kinds of protection                  
  in current law for seniors.                                                  
                                                                               
  Number 496                                                                   
                                                                               
  MR. WEYRUACH answered no.                                                    
                                                                               
  REP. MULDER asked Mr. Grover to respond to the points just                   
  made.                                                                        
                                                                               
  Number 510                                                                   
                                                                               
  MR. GROVER disagreed with Mr. Weyrauch's testimony.  He                      
  believes even attorneys in the field of labor law disagree                   
  sometimes on the issues, and that employers who in good                      
  faith have not paid overtime are assessed liquidated                         
  damages.                                                                     
                                                                               
  MR. GROVER noted that private settlements are allowed in all                 
  other areas of law, but wage and hour cases.                                 
                                                                               
  Number 550                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. MULDER stated that section (f) of the bill is the guts                  
  of the bill that allows for private settlements.                             
                                                                               
  Number 572                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. BRIAN PORTER stated he does not support amendments.                     
                                                                               
  Number 586                                                                   
                                                                               
  CHAIRMAN HUDSON asked if the federal law provides any extra                  
  assurances for anyone of advanced age.                                       
                                                                               
  MR. GROVER stated the law did not distinguish by age.                        
                                                                               
  Number 600                                                                   
                                                                               
  CHAIRMAN HUDSON asked if there was anything in the revised                   
  law that would prevent seniors from receiving equal                          
  treatment.                                                                   
                                                                               
  MR. GROVER answered no.                                                      
                                                                               
  Number 613                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. MULDER said, senior citizens are not asking to be                       
  treated differently than anyone else.  He added that any                     
  individual that felt they had been cheated, should talk to                   
  the Department of Labor.                                                     
                                                                               
  REP. JOE SITTON stated the Department of Labor has added a                   
  wage and hour position in the Governor's budget.                             
                                                                               
  CHAIRMAN HUDSON responded that the position referenced was                   
  not in the fiscal note attached to this bill, so it was                      
  apparently for other uses.                                                   
                                                                               
  TAPE 94-14, SIDE B                                                           
  Number 001                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. MULDER stated that section 4 is arbitrary, but it would                 
  allow those cases that were started to be affected by HB 459                 
  retroactively.                                                               
  Number 020                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. PORTER stated he supports this retroactive clause in                    
  section 4 because it allows more cases the option of a                       
  private settlement, which in turn would free up the court                    
  system.                                                                      
                                                                               
  Number 041                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. BILL WILLIAMS moved that HB 459 be passed out of                        
  committee with individual recommendations and a zero fiscal                  
  note.  There were no objections.                                             
                                                                               

Document Name Date/Time Subjects